After a yearlong review, the L.A. County sheriff’s independent watchdog fails to determine if deputies moved her skeletal remains with or without permission from the coroner’s office.
By Robert Faturechi, Los Angeles Times
Marzo 15, 2012
A yearlong probe has failed to determine if Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies moved, without permission from the coroner, the skeletal remains of a woman who went missing after being released from the department’s custody.
Mitrice Richardson, 24, drew national media attention in 2009 when she disappeared after being released from the sheriff’s Lost Hills/Malibu station around midnight, without her car, borsa o cellulare. Quasi 11 months after her disappearance, her remains were spotted in a remote Malibu Canyon ravine.
In 2010, a high-ranking Los Angeles County coroner’s official told The Times that sheriff’s deputies may have violated the law at the time by removing Richardson’s remains without his permission, potentially undermining the thoroughness of the coroner’s investigation.
After Assistant Chief Coroner Ed Winter’s comments, the sheriff’s official watchdog agency launched a probe into the dispute.
The watchdog agency was set to issue a report finding Winter’s criticism to be at least partly true, but after a draft of the report was circulated, a sheriff’s detective came forward with new information that contradicted his department’s long-standing narrative and put the dispute in question again.
The Office of Independent Review’s rapporto conferma conto del Dipartimento dello Sceriffo della prima fase della rimozione: I funzionari che inizialmente sceriffo creduto che solo un teschio e forse un paio di altre ossa erano lì, e sono state concesse il permesso da parte del medico legale per spostare i resti parziali.
Tuttavia, revisione l'agenzia non ha potuto determinare se i funzionari dello sceriffo chiesto ulteriore autorizzazione una volta che le ossa si alzavano e si è scoperto che l'intero scheletro di Richardson era lì.
Dopo che la controversia è stata resa pubblica in 2010, sia il portavoce dello sceriffo e il capitano omicidio del dipartimento riconosciuto che i deputati dello sceriffo non ha chiesto ulteriore autorizzazione una volta sono stati scoperti più ossa, saying they had to move quickly because of nightfall and the treacherous terrain.
Michael Gennaco, che dirige l'Ufficio della rassegna, said he was prepared to criticize the Sheriff’s Department for “a significant lapse” in not asking for that permission.
But then the sheriff’s detective who had been on scene said he did, di fatto, tell a coroner’s captain that more remains were found after the bones were moved onto a plastic sheet. He said he was told “whatever you’ve got on plastic, just bring it out.”
A coroner’s captain denied that the detective made such a phone call.
“Because of this conflict in the evidence, we will never know for certain whether such a request was made,” the watchdog’s report concluded.
Asked why sheriff’s officials did not previously know about their detective’s phone call, department spokesman Steve Whitmore said “he just didn’t offer it up … which is one of the reasons the [Ufficio di Independent Review] did its review, to drill down to exactly what did happen and what didn’t happen.”
Fonte: LA. Times
Nessun Commento
Commenti per Domande ancora irrisolti nella gestione dei resti di Mitrice Richardson sono ormai chiuse.